this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
1248 points (99.3% liked)
196
5372 readers
126 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can check the wayback machine, or the pdf here. Do you mind citing where she advocates for each of those?
The issues page on her website, Section 2 Chapter 13
Okay cool, that's the only one I found too. So nothing about Medicaid for all or getting the money out of politics, right? Because without those on top, I think it's not surprising that folks were unmotivated by stuff like:
And also immediately following that
It also talks about returning the Capital Gains tax rate to the way it was in 1986.
I could swear it also mentioned the unrealized gains tax plan they wanted to implement but that isn't shown here.
So we have given up on the other two claims then right, she hasn't been for medicare for all since the 2020 primary, right? Further when it goes on to say,
Can you see why this didn't capture the enthusiasm of a voting population that is largely very sick of slow incremental changes that are so desperately in line with the status quo? People get inspired by a fighter, and 'finding a nice balance' on how much we should tax the corporations during what people view as rapid greed driven inflation.
That is a assuming they are in the weeds deep enough to even to know what she is doing. This article describing the steps paints a picture of someone that's serious about money in politics.
This on top of Gaza, on top of Biden taking so long to drop out and have no primary. It sets the stage for a candidate that democrats didn't fall in love with, and lost to the republicans falling in line.
The guy who won made the effective corporate tax rate less than 10%.
The Harris administration wanted to raise tax on the rich and keep the same or lower the taxes of everyone else from before the TCJA raised taxes on middle class and below. Simple as.
As for Medicaid for All, she supports it, but its not a presidential policy because it requires 60 senators. The Biden admin helped relieve many from medical debts and also had medical debts stricken from everyones credit reports.