this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)
guns
2584 readers
37 users here now
Rules (Under review):
-
- NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
-
- Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
-
- Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
-
- Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
-
- Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put "CW: hunting" in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don't derail other people's threads.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fucked up that the MG3 looks just like the Nazi era MG42. Didn't bother changing a thing about its looks.
the Germans actually even converted MG42s to the MG3 standard, there's guns with the original 42 markings literally crossed out:
but tbf, if you have the guns and the manufacturing lines set up, you might as well use them - the Yugoslavs also used MG-42s, both captured and their own manufactured ones:
plus StG-44s:
the Czechoslovaks inherited half-track tooling (since the Nazis had converted tank factories in Czechia to making their own models), so they kept making them for a while:
the Soviets seized the V-2 manufacturing facilities and kept making them under a new name:
and various other examples
A much greater sin than keeping the aesthetics of some guns is keeping the actual guys who ran the war