this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
673 points (96.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12229 readers
1383 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Been saying it for years, and starting to feel like I'm going insane. How in the fuck have so many municipalities around the world, especially those concerned with vehicle-based terrorist attacks on pedestrians, not settled on bollards? If it works for embassies, military bases, and other sensitive sites, why not exclusively vehicle-free areas?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

not settled on bollards?

I remember, maybe last year, there was city "debate" over installing bollards at intersections to protect cyclists and pedestrians. From what I recall, NIMBYs pushed HARD against the idea, saying it was "confusing" and "dangerous" for motorists...

Anything to save lives or improve safety tends to be an automatic "NO!" in most places because of NIMBYs.

That's why certain safety projects should just move forward without public input.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're giving me flashbacks to the implementation of traffic roundabouts in my country. They've been used for a long, long time all over the world with minimal complication, but people were talking as though the cities were reinventing the fucking wheel. Long story short, they got installed anyways and work fine - much ado about nothing lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

installed anyways and work fine - much ado about nothing lol

most conservative pushback goes like that. "This change is scary and bad!" -> change is good, actually. Often, the conservatives will then fight to defend against the thing they fought against before. It's just kneejerk emotions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Too true, they're easy as pie, and not so tricky as a pedestrian either (the queuing feels off because of the way that cars don't automatically come to a stop at a red light).

load more comments (21 replies)