this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23037 readers
150 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been listening to Guerrilla Warfare this week and it’s just had me thinking about Che more generally, particularly how he was essentially killed trying to replicate the Cuban pattern in Bolivia.

Was his strategy adventurist? Did it become adventurist by applying it in the wrong conditions? Were the Cuban revolutionaries just adventurists that got lucky - (Fidel wasn’t even communist at the time so it’s hard to say they were following some kind of Leninist line)? Do we just call armed insurrections adventurism if they fail, heroism if they win?

I wouldn’t consider myself an expert on Che or the movements he fought in, I know a decent amount about Cuba, but very little about his time in Africa or elsewhere. Looking to start a discussion and hopefully be educated by comrades who are more well-read on this topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

It would be a touch more accurate to say his actions after Cuba were more commandist than adventurist

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

In vulgarized terms, its the inverse of tailism.

In more elaborated terms, its where a party or its leadership dictates revolutionary action from ahead of the proletariat without adequately considering the actual conditions or the will of the masses. The tendency of commandism usually manifests in the form of an impatience to jump directly to open revolution, bypassing critical stages of development of dual power structures and neglecting the importance of mass mobilization and education.

In some circles commandism is also called "Left-Adventurism"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

Thanks for the answer. Have a good day/night wherever you are

load more comments (5 replies)