this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
300 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

71623 readers
3805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (22 children)

One thing I really don't get in the discussion around EVs and charging is, why are people so afraid of tripping the main breaker? If you have a total of e.g. 17 kW available and happen to go over, just reset the main breaker (or replace it in case it's still a traditional one). It's there precisely so that you wouldn't need to care about overloading the connection.

In my experience people get by with a 3x25A (17 kW available, matches approximately a 70A service in the US) while using the available power to

  • heat/cool a single family home (in -20 °C weather mind you)
  • run all appliances (including the oven, stove, dryer etc.)
  • heat up a sauna
  • charge an EV
  • whatever else you typically would want to plug in, kettles and such

While it's true you can trip the main breaker if you have everything on at the same time, typically it never happens even if there are no lockouts in place preventing overuse. And it's not like tripping it causes any permanent harm.

Why is an electrical service upgrade constantly brought up as a solution when any home with >15 kW of available power won't need it? Is it against code to purposefully overcommit your mains in the US or something?

Edit: there were valid concerns raised over how long-lived the breakers are (probably won't be rated for tens of fault-condition related trips), also that these smaller service specs aren't as common as I've gathered from the media. That might have something to do with this at least. Thanks for the replies – it's been an interesting discussion.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

The way that it works in most countries is that the breakers are per circuit in your wall. The breakers trip in order to prevent that single circuit from overheating and starting a fire in your walls.

Let’s say you have a wire that’s rated for 16amps. More than that and it becomes a fire risk just threw overheating. @230v that gives you 3680w per circuit.

If you have your industrial microwave, water heater, and car charger all going at the same time on that same circuit. This will draw way more than 3680w and thus would go over that 16a limit.

The breakers trips once you go over that 16a limit for safety. It’s a good thing. This all being said no sane electrician would put those three things on the same circuit. lol.

Circuit breakers are actually what enable you to safely over provision. Without them fires would just be a matter of time.

I know it works this way in the U.S. and Germany at least.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Not talking about the circuits, but the main electrical connection to the grid. To me it often seems like there's reluctance in ~~overcommitting~~ overprovisioning that capacity: as an example, four 16A circuits on a 25A main breaker. Here that's quite common, but even in Tech connections videos I've seen him bring up smart electric cabinets or automatic load monitoring when putting enough capacity on the mains to possibly go over.

What I'm asking is, why bother? If you trip the mains by having too much load, just reset the breaker and be done with it. No need to automate things to not run into that situation, one will learn to not have the oven on while charging the car full blast. No need to gimp the charger amperage since you're running a new circuit anyway, and it's not like it's much different running a 20A circuit vs a 40A one. If that's 70% of your total available capacity, it doesn't matter – worst you have to do is walk downstairs and flip a switch.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

ADHD guy here.

Wondering if these are reasons but need someone knowledgable to answer

  • does the mains breaker have a limited amount of resets / duty cycle?
  • is it bad for the whole house to trip sometimes? For me having to reset electronics, potential data loss etc makes it annoying.
  • is there a potential for surging when the mains is flicked back on from everything starting simultaneously?
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Tripping a breaker under fault conditions is somewhat destructive to the breaker, and if it keeps tripping, you'll notice it becomes easier and easier over time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

one of us

  1. Hadn't considered that one TBH, no practical limits with actuations (rated in the thousands) but they're probably not rated for that many trips under a fault condition – now I'm curious, will have to dig up a spec sheet at some point
  2. Not really, unless you have equipment that's poorly designed everything should be fine. It's not much different from a brownout, and things should be configured to deal with that anyways if you don't have a UPS
  3. If there are a lot of reactive loads, then yes – e.g. electric motors, large capacitors. Those will have a large inrush when started again. Typically there isn't that much reactive loading in a residential home though, and it should be covered by the latency designed into the breaker.

The first point is actually a really good one, and one I didn't really remember to consider. I'd guess it has at least something to do with that (and would explain why many homes around here are still configured with traditional fuses for the main connection – no need to worry about lifetime when you have to replace them anyways)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)