Selfhosted

48403 readers

848 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Can/should I just use a networked folder as a duplicati backup destination? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Stumbling through getting a proper backup regime in place. I have an unraid system running a proper array, and am trying to setup backups for two separate machines (one windows one debian). I've successfully setup a file share, and have duplicati running. Are there disadvantages to just setting the network folder as the destination for the backup? It seems a little hamfisted (and the data rates are terrible).

It seems like there's probably a better way to do this...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I think you're asking about the Samba share? If it works, there's no real downside except the speed and general wonkiness of the SMB protocol.

As I would rank the different options:

Rsync+SSH would be fastest if you're sending entire directories and not packaging first. A bit slower if sending huge files.
NFS would be fastest if sending prepackaged large files, but overall slower if sending a bunch of smaller files
SMB will be slowest in any scenario, but may be easier for you

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

This is really helpful thank you! I think it's samba share? Whatever Unraid has just baked in and calls "shares".

Googling rsync that looks like it'll work, and faster is better!

While I do want true backups of a few drives (as in: if a drive fails, restore the backup to a new drive, physically swap it out, and you're good to go), the majority of the data I'm just looking to have it "backed up" (as in: all of the files are present in more than one location). The majority of the data is ~18TB of media for my plex server. My unraid is: 1x 2TB, 1x 10TB, 1x20TB and 1x20TB(parity). It sounds like Rsync-ing the 20TB drive with my plex media and the 20TB unraid disk would get me what I need?

Thanks for the pointers, getting a few things to google is incredibly helpful.

load more comments (4 replies)