this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
47 points (92.7% liked)
Public Health
816 readers
236 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (📍)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The study, since it's not in the article from what I can tell.
https://www.sleephealthjournal.org/article/S2352-7218(25)00089-0/fulltext
One thing that wasn't mentioned in it is socioeconomic factors. Since the participants chose their own foods after the initial period, I'm betting the people that were already better off economically typically had a "healthier" diet. They're probably not getting their 5 cups of fruit and veg via fried zucchini and banana splits.
Another interesting thing was the maintenance of a ten hour eating window. I wonder why they chose that. There was an offset that had a flimsy reasoning behind it, but the window itself wasn't explained.