this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
169 points (97.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

35230 readers
446 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (3 children)

This is Lemmy I regularly get replies to three month old comments.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

but I won't get the insightful reply someone else makes next week unless they reply to me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Why shouldn't you get a well-considered answer? I'm sure you'll take another look at the thread. It does happen, but then you're usually one of the few people who read these well-considered answers.

I'm not saying that there aren't well-researched answers on social media, I'm just getting at the fact that there's time pressure if you want your answer to reach a certain audience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe one day we will be able to sort by old posts that have got a bunch of good, new comments.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

That would be great.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Most people aren’t into thread necromancy. New post and comments get more replies than the old ones. They aren’t completely forgotten, but the difference in attention is massive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Again it’s Lemmy.

It’s the difference between two upvotes and three.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Says the guy with 4 upvotes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's true, of course. But these responses are hardly visible to most people. Of course, the thread is still online years later, but since people today generally only use social media apps, they no longer see these responses, no matter how valuable they may be. If anything, they only perceive these delayed responses as part of the data sets of LLMs – but then mostly without reference to the original content.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm either too high or not high enough to understand that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

What I mean by this is that every topic is treated like breaking news on social media. However, news reports are characterized by the fact that they are usually outdated by the next day because they are only relevant for a limited period of time. This is not true for many topics discussed on social media. In fact, it is even possible to repeat something after a certain period of time (e.g., reposting memes), which is impossible with actual news reports.