UK Nature and Environment

656 readers

27 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our spring banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

‘The hypocrisy is staggering’: will swift bricks fall prey to government fears of Reform? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On more than 50 occasions over the past three years, Hannah Bourne-Taylor has lugged an oversized brick through the parliament’s security screening.

Security staff know her fondly as “the swift brick lady”. But now Bourne-Taylor is having to ruffle political feathers over what appears the simplest of nature-friendly measures – a small legal clause requiring all new dwellings to include a £35 hollow brick, providing homes for endangered cavity-nesting birds including swifts, house martins, sparrows and starlings.

After walking naked except for a thong through London – twice – to raise awareness of the plight of swifts, winning a parliamentary debate and cross-party support for the brick, Bourne-Taylor is facing her greatest foe yet: a Labour government terrified of voters defecting to Reform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As someone who spends an inordinate amount of their life reviewing planning applications, it's notable that most new properties include swift bricks (and bat bricks) pretty much at standard now, even without the regulations. They're incredibly cheap and entirely non-obtrusive; from a conservation point of view it's a no brainer.

I imagine most that don't include it is more through either laziness or ignorance rather than a strategic choice to omit them. Having them in the regulations would seem an easy win.