this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
118 points (94.0% liked)

Asklemmy

49361 readers
1242 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Wouldn't that be nice?

But the truth would be: someone will find a way to make guns on their own, then the rest of us would be defenseless against that.

This is the reason why militaries have nuclear weapons despite wanting peace.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If you think they would be the consequence of banning and removing guns from society, you can test this theory by looking at any country which has already done this. What you find is that gun violence is extremely minimal in these countries. So turns out your worries are over nothing!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And you know who protect such society? That's right, folks with guns!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Militaries having guns is a very different thing to the general population having guns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

All guns should be surrendered and destroyed en masse.

Quoting the original comment directly.

This does not say the militaries can have it.

load more comments (6 replies)