this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
983 points (99.4% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2909 readers
970 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 243 points 2 months ago (29 children)

Props to the movies that shout the "Loose!" command

[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 months ago (27 children)

As I understand it, that's still not very historically accurate. It was not really a thing for archers to nock and loose together like they do in the movies.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volley_fire Y'all really just make stuff up without even checking wikipedia huh? It wasn't typically used in medieval Europe for bows beyond the initial volley, though of course initial volleys were still a thing. You didn't just have elements of archer formations fire whenever they decided the range seemed right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I followed the cited source for the wikipedia claim, and it's just a guy writing a paper and saying his opinion. He's not citing anything deeper to cover his claim about an initial volley followed by targetting individual solders. Just because it's in a paper doesn't mean it's right, or even well-researched.

Sure, it FEELS right, and that does have weight with living history and experimental archeology, but I worry that "feeling" is the only thing anyone is actually citing in this whole conversation, including Wikipedia.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)