this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1464 readers
1 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
huh. I actually want to respect The Intercept. I wonder how the article will really frame things. If it’s framed as a way to dismiss him, and not just in passing as part of a larger comprehensive profile on Grusch… that’s quite rude.
I also don’t understand why struggling with these issues would make someone unfit to be a whistleblower. And why that is assumed to be why it is included in a profile of Grusch. That’s not how things should work.
And I also recognize it’s not cool to touch on this sort of stuff in a profile on someone if it’s not otherwise public info.
Something is weird here.
Edit: The Intercept says
I think it's important to note that his PTSD diagnosis and treatment occurred prior to his latest positions, which means even the intelligence community found him fit to perform his job.