this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
74 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23042 readers
162 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Brightly-coloured bad urbanism is still bad urbanism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Where can I read more about this topic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Poor neighborhoods that are ignored/allowed to grow with zero planning by the city government, eventually become a big enough group of problems that the useless dickheads in charge say "alright, lets fix this". The quickest thing to do is to paint soulless murals and bright colors on the small poor houses to give the impresion of doing something.

It's not intrinsically a bad thing nor necesarily counterproductive to attack the aesthetics first, but since the bigger solutions usually never come, it's infuriating. It's the kind of shit ~~CIA larvae rearing centres~~ failsons-lead NGOs do.

Something something "poverty romantization", etc

https://www.vice.com/es/article/el-problema-de-querer-combatir-la-pobreza-con-pintura-en-bogota/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thank you. Please forgive, I didn't intend to imply aesthetics fix everything despite my comment appearing so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Pff, relax, no problem