this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
84 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39254 readers
213 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 32 points 7 months ago (6 children)

They need to be insured like bank accounts. Everyone I know that makes less than 50k a year is getting their shit direct deposited to cashapp and using cashapp like it's their bank. If they go belly up in a financial crash, it's going to be like the great depression, but only for already poor folk

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Cashapp doesn't hold customer money. It has banking partners that hold customer funds.

[–] ThemboMcBembo@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago

There's a secondary problem.

If a user has money in their account and the app creator goes under, they lose access but the actual bank hasn't failed. Insurance on the account doesn't kick in because there's no bank failure to mitigate, but the user still doesn't have access to their money before.

These regulations weren't written with banking-as-a-service in mind, and don't hold up well now that it's not a weird edge case but a primary way companies provide banking services.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)