this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
-3 points (0.0% liked)

Progressive Politics, Gun Control, Single Payer Healthcare and Free Abortions for All!

589 readers
1 users here now

We like leftists and liberals.

We want to ban all guns.

We want free healthcare.

We want UBI.

We don't mind being taxed.

We want to give everyone a free abortion!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Saying “Gun violence” instead of “Violence” is dog whistling that you care more about disarming people than saving lives.

I'm saying gun violence because that's the topic. Getting upset over this wording is like getting upset somebody calls a ride on a plane "air travel" instead of "travel". That's the category of the subject being discussed.

That aside, yes, most political violence world wide is right wing violence. This is mainly due to Islamic terrorism, which is right wing. Note that is not American right wing.

Even if you're just limiting to domestic terrorism, right wing terrorism is the majority of said terrorism.

Define shootings

I thought it was pretty clear that I was talking about politically motivated attacks when I was talking about the straight white shooters thing. Gang violence isn't really politically motivated.

And your numbers are way off:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081

https://www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N363273/

Guess what? They have a right wing bias. They generally don’t report shootings because there’s no angle. Left wing sites do report on them because they want to push an anti-gun narrative, that and ratings.

So when left wing sources push an angle, it's to reduce deaths. When right wing sources push an angle, it's to demonize minorities who are already at risk for violence.

And you think the chosen angle for this particular case makes you look good?

Don’t think I didn’t notice just how light on details that AP is. They talk a bunch about the victims and Joel osteen, but they barely give you her name.

Glorifying shooters only makes copy cats more likely. The AP is being responsible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Per the Reuters article from 2016 - 2020, trans people accounted for 2.3% of mass shootings but per 2020 census data only account for 0.6% of the population. They are 4x more likely to commit a mass shooting then the rest of the population.

See I can cherry pick stats to make them say what I want to too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow you straight up admitted you were cherypicking. You have no argument so I'll move on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The difference between you and I is that I'm honest enough to admit when I'm using cherry picked stats.