wallstreetbets

461 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 
The stock market has reacted quickly to policy uncertainty and tariffs, impacting Nasdaq stocks.
Technical analyst Helene Meisler sees a bearish, oversold market, hinting at potential rally.
Market sentiment charts show selling pressure subsiding, but panic could trigger a bullish turn.

The stock market's constant reaction to policy uncertainty and tariffs has dominated the news over the past few weeks.

But using headlines to guess where markets go next is a bad idea. Once information is widely known, it's already priced into the market and probably too late to react.

A close look at data demonstrates how quickly markets can react to a headline. For example, on March 3, President Donald Trump preemptively announced that tariffs on Canada and Mexico would go into effect the following day after he delayed them. Instantly, stocks making new lows on the Nasdaq spiked.

However, the same data can be used to gauge real-time market sentiment and find clues for where markets go next. Helene Meisler, a technical analyst who sifts through data and publishes charts weekly, says signals indicate that the market is in bearish and oversold territory — a sign that we could see an oversold rally in the near term. But if we don't, then panic can set in, she added.

"If we chop around here for a couple of days and then we rally again, maybe people get a little more excited, and they ease off a little bit on the bearishness," she said. "But ultimately, I think we're going down again."

The bottom isn't in yet since she doesn't see panic, something she uses the International Securities Exchange put-call ratio to determine. Once there are more options to sell (puts) than to buy (calls) for numerous days, it'll suggest panic. And once we get there, Meisler will turn bullish.

In mid-December, Meisler called for a correction in the first quarter. While she couldn't gauge the depth or reason for it, she advised taking profits ahead of the event, citing that the overbought/oversold oscillator was making lower highs, a sign that buying pressure was weakening.

"If you asked me back then what I thought would take the market down, I'm certain my answer was that, if we knew then it's already priced in," Meisler said. "So the answer is, I never know. It's always going to be something from left field."

Below are five charts Meisler is focusing on this week to gauge market sentiment and the stock market's near-term outlook. Market charts

The chart below shows the number of stocks making new 52-week lows traded on the Nasdaq Composite Index. It shows that over the past week, fewer stocks have made new lows, indicating that selling is drying up and bearish sentiment is slowing down. Meisler focused on the Nasdaq this week since the index saw the steepest pullback of the three major indexes. Nasdaq Composite New Lows StockCharts. com

The chart below shows overall market breadth, which tracks most stocks. It recently made a higher low, suggesting that selling pressure is subsiding.

In contrast, the lower chart for the S&P 500 shows the index continued to make a lower low, indicating a divergence as investors continued to shed off riskier, rich technology stocks. Still, it's a good sign because only a handful of stocks had been the mover of the major index.

"So, it tells you that the index movers are pulling the index down, but for the majority of stocks, the selling has stopped," Meisler said. NYSE Breadth (top) and S&P 500 (bottom) Helene Meisler

Below is a chart that shows stocks trading on the NYSE were in overbought territory in the final quarter of 2024. As we neared 2025, overbought peaks were making lower highs, indicating that buying pressure was drying up. However, March's oversold trough remained higher than December's oversold trough, suggesting there's now less momentum on the downside, Meisler said.

While stocks remain in oversold territory, they are beginning to recover as the oscillator approaches the zero or neutral mark.

The chart below is from StockCharts.com. NYSE overbought/oversold Oscillator StockCharts.com

Since 2024, the S&P 500's highs were accompanied by bulls at 60% based on data from the Investors Intelligence Survey, a sentiment survey for attitudes of US advisors.

"Over 60% is typically too many bulls, Meisler said. "I can't think of in my career, and I've been doing this since 1982, I can't think of one time we went over 70%."

Data from the previous week shows the bears are only at 27%. Bullish sentiment versus the S&P 500. Data investors Intelligence, chart by Meisler.

It's up to investors to decide what side of the market they'd rather be on.

"I have an old trader friend who always says, sometimes you want to be on the outside looking in, rather than on the inside wishing you were out," Meisler said. "And to me the market has that feeling to it right now. But if we got panic, I'd be bullish."

2
 
 

cross-posted from: https://wallstreets.bet/post/1273

TLDR: It seems to me like there is a real question hanging out in the ether around who actually owns the content that gets posted to reddit. The ongoing protests bring to light some important points about reddit and social media companies as a whole, specifically around content generation, ownership, and brand identity.

Positions: Long dated puts on Reddit once they IPO and options become available; Long dated puts/ calls on alphabet depending on how they react.

Thesis:

For social media sites like reddit (and perhaps to a greater extent, youtube and tictoc), there is an ongoing conflict that will always be present between the owners of the company, and the 'owners' of the content. In the case of youtube, the owners of the company (alphabet) have pretty clearly understood that the content that they host is not 'theirs', that its the property of the uploader/ creator/ copyright holder, etc.. In this case, there is pretty clear and established law around video and audio media for this kind of property rights. Because of this, youtube has primarily built its self as a support engine for the generation and consumption of that content, and doesn't see themselves as the 'owners' of that content; this is made even more clear by the profit sharing arrangements they'll enter into for channels that are doing well, generating traffic, etc. In 2022, advertising made up 80% of googles revenue, and while its rather opaque about how much of that is search or other services, youtube is the 9000 kg gorilla in the room. Its one of the only clear advertising pathways that gives advertisers reliable in-site into if their ad was actually seen, it gives them clear metrics into demographics and audience due to the videos. So just keep in mind, inspite of all of the AI hype, advertising is still 80% of alphabets revenue; this is largely from a social media/ content platform (not that dissimilar from reddit from a discovery perspective). I think its also important to note here that youtube has been aggressively experimenting with countering ad-blockers/ forced consumption via apps, etc.

Reddit has a very different perception of ownership than youtube has taken. Reddit very clearly sees themselves as the owners of everything that gets created on their platform. While this is legally dubious, that is irrelevant to the premise. For example, lets say that youtube wanted to force all people to use the app to watch youtube. There would be nothing stopping content creators from pulling their videos off youtube, moving to some other platform; taking their ball and going home. Youtube would have no recourse. They couldnt force the channels back up or post the videos elsewhere without putting themselves in serious legal jeopardy, which they would definitely lose on at least most high courts. Contrasting this with reddit, the company is going to be forcing open these subreddits and opening them up; perhaps replacing moderators; etc. So, to some extent, this might open them up to legal jeopardy. I think there is a clear argument that you can make that by starting and moderating a subreddit, you've 'created' something. That same argument extends to the posts and content its self. I do see this as a very unlikely case, and one not likely to hold up under our current legal system. However, this DD is about what this implies to the broader social media landscape. Reddits commitment to the enshittification of all things through their forcing of users to be beholden to capitol is consistent with the degradation of all platforms during their lifecycle.

When things are novel, new modes of interaction are created. The beginning of the lifecycle is chaotic, wild-west energy. This generates excitement, fomo for the new thing, and as a result, exponential growth. This is where the first 1-20% of users come from. These are the super users, the mods, the comment creators, and the commentors. These 20% are followed in the second phase by the 20-60%. These are the consumers, the one word replies. In reddit parlance: "this". This cohort confuses themselves with the first 20%. The final 40% come in after the west has been tamed, when the avatars are released, they see wild thing that corporate has tamed and thinks this is the way things have always been.

This distribution is consistent across almost every domain, where a very small percentage of participants is responsible for the vast majority of activity, and most low engagement users confuse themselves as being higher engagement.

Lets start putting this all together. Reddit has created no reward or profit sharing for its most highly engaged audience (the 20%). Reddit also does not see the content generated on their platform as yours; they see it as theirs. Effectively you (the content creator) have no rights to what you do on their software. There are clear alternatives for content sharing and generation to reddit. Lemmy is one of them, but realistically, there are others, much more popular (tictoc, insta, etc..). None of them are as good an aggregator as reddit, the "front page of the internet" (whoever made the decision to get rid of that tagline should be fired). What this situation does, however, is create a kind of battle for the spirit of where social media goes next. If reddit can effectively "get away" with stealing the content that not-reddit has made using their platform, other social media platforms will follow.

So building on the enshittification of all things, and consistent with what we're seeing across the web-3.0 internet, we're watching what were previously open spaces turn into walled gardens, and walled gardens turn into moated castles. Why is this relevant or how does this turn into a DD? My thinking here is that the reddit blackout has real implications for the enshittification of all things. If companies can steal your content and not pay you for it, they will. This might be dependent on how 'locked in' they think they have you. I think youtube would be next, my speculation is that they would look to create a 'two-teired' ownership structure. They won't risk getting sued by Miramax, but they could give a shit if you want to leave with your 100k subscriber channel. They're keeping your content and you can fuck off (which is effectively what reddit is doing and may be able to set a precedent for).

Since this is a DD, I'm required to post positions, so here they are.

I'm still waiting on the Reddit IPO, and once options become available, I'm expecting a Rivian style blow up and then blow out. I'm going to try buying the longest dated puts possible at the top. Since they arent public yet, its unclear to me what strikes I'll be getting, but I'll be watching for a peak, and then will buy at the money.

Further, I'm going to be paying extremely close attention to how other social media companies react to the reddit black out from a content ownership and creation standpoint, with my primary being alphabet. I'll also be monitoring the growth of the fediverse closely and looking to see how viable the alternatives are. Its important to remember that all of the modern monoliths in social media started as alternatives, so don't count out the geeks.

If youtube takes a similar tack as reddit, and especially if there is a growing/ viable alternative space like floatplane or peertube, or whatever, I'm looking at long dated puts. If they seem like they are doing more to support their creators, I'll go for long dated calls.

Either way, I think we're in for some seismic shifts in the social media landscape over the next 3 years. I'm really excited for the reddit IPO, mostly so that I can profit from their downfall. I think they really misunderstand where their value is created.

3
 
 

Wtf

4
 
 

Were you a part of wallstreetbets? Do you enjoy making stupid bets on what a line on the screen is going to do? Are you over reddit and looking for a place to plant some roots? Consider taking some pressure off lemmy.ml and migrating to wallstreets.bet. We're looking to be the federated home of monetary degeneracy and your place to post plays, due diligence, memes about jpow etc..

5
6
7
8
9
 
 
10
 
 

waiting for the us dollar to collapse 🤗🤗

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
 
 
18
 
 
19
20
 
 

WSB just got banned on reddit, maybe this will be a thing now? The federated internet really can't happen soon enough.