does this count as a carbon sink
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
106 points (98.2% liked)
News
30946 readers
2439 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The news just keeps getting worse, doesn't it?
Wagner cautioned that the study’s major extrapolation — that there are 27 million metric tons of nanoplastic in the North Atlantic, more than the weight of 26,000 Eiffel towers — relies on “very few samples.” Still, Wagner said it makes sense that there would be an exorbitant amount of nanoplastic given the high volume of larger plastic fragments that end up in the oceans each year. According to the United Nations, roughly 20 million tons of plastic enter aquatic ecosystems each year. This includes lakes, rivers, and streams, as well as oceans, but for much of that pollution, the ocean is the final destination.
“We’ve basically been dumping plastic in the ocean for decades,” Woodruff said. “It doesn’t go away, it just breaks down into smaller plastics, so it does make sense that you would find more nanoplastics than macro and microplastics.”
Very sad state of affairs.
But 26,000 Eiffel towers cracks me up. Yes, ofcourse i can relate to that as the general manager of the monuments warehouse where we store thousands of monuments.
Anything but metric!
place your bets: what will extinctify the human species first:
plastic
forever chemicals
climate fuckery
measles/pandemic 2.0
WWIII
something else!?
Climate. Everything else are symptoms or not species threatening
I'm betting none of those. Humans will be around for a while. Not all of us, just the richest and worst of us.
Those will for sure take out the other animals though. But humans will remain to keep destroying anything of value possibly on other planets too!
WWIII is my guess. But whatever it is, it will almost certainly be our own doing. We're in much more of a hurry than nature is
be our own doing
yea, i figured that's pretty much a given at this point
Well it's not a given unless you're cynical. Which I am now :/
nanoplastic — plastic particles 100 times smaller than the width of a human hair.
I hate this type of dumbed down description with the actual info removed. It's like when someone describes the capacity of a hard drive in terms of "libraries of congress" or "feet of stacked paper" instead of gigabytes or terabytes. We all use hard drives and know what a terabyte is, so give us the plain info.
Anyway, clicking the Nature link shows that nanoplastic means less than 1 micron diameter. That's much simpler than making us look up the diameter of a human hair to find out how big the plastic is.