this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1590 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

52364 readers
463 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draedron 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunately there is no alternative

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There is.

Do it in humans.

Humans can understand the risks involved. Other animals cannot.

If we're going to fuck something up, it better be on our own species.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But we can't. That's why we're testing it on animals

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

And if you look long enough in the right places, you can also pay them peanuts... or for them 😒

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Would you like them to test on you instead?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Yea stopping animal testing sounds great, but animal testing is the backbone of drug and medical breakthroughs. So at least for now that's not possible

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Recognition that animal testing is actually pretty fucked up would be a good start toward funding research into alternatives, such as biological computer simulations.

We can simulate complex/chaotic systems, like weather, in nearly real-time, so biosim research is mainly a funding and staffing problem at this point.

Probably we'll still need animal testing for the final phase before human trials, but we can at least reduce the need for it to bare minimums.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›