games

21022 readers

220 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
Mark spoilers
No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

138

Fair warning to anyone considering Starfield. The performance of this game is absolute crap. (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It runs at 30fps on all the lowest settings on a 2070 with 64gb ram and an i9-12900K.

It is quite possibly the worst performing game I have ever seen. It's a piece of crap.

Glad I didn't pay for this shit. And I will not. 🏴‍☠️ The writing and worldbuilding is probably AI and gutter tier liberal political takes anyway.

I am absolutely stunned by just how badly this thing runs like omfg I run Elden Ring at 120fps at the same resolution. What the fuck is wrong at Bethesda? I'm so mad about this I just played Armoured Core at a rock solid 144fps and it is so jarring to go from that to this absolutely horrific performance.

(page 3) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

My brother told me it ran a lot better after moving it on his SSD

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I know it sucks for some people, but this is definitely an AMD optimized game. And in the time I've spent playing it, other than some funny glitches and some lighting issues, it's ran smooth on my all AMD system.

I was really surprised. I'm used to trying to play a game, only to read on a steam forum that it doesn't play nice with AMD and there is no fix.

load more comments