this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
487 points (94.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8048 readers
2 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Epic First Run programme allows developers of any size to claim 100% of revenue if they agree to make their game exclusive on the Epic Games Store for six months.

After the six months are up, the game will revert to the standard Epic Games Store revenue split of 88% for the developer and 12% for Epic Games.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaded 3 points 2 years ago (25 children)

Ouf, crazy how many people are actually pushing for valve to have a complete monopoly. Ya it's a good product but so was chrome. Diversity is important for consumers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

They need to make a better product to compete. I'm not rooting for valve but epic can eat a bag of dicks too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I don't mind competition but I hate superfluous launchers that launch when you launch a game from another launcher.

I'd love to see competing game stores that were all genuinely good, but let's be honest: Most of them are mediocre-to-shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

That's like Walmart showing up to a town that didn't have any and claiming it's diversity because it isn't Costco. Options are good, but there needs to actually be a better reason for customers to use it than just use it even though it sucks for the sake of competition. Especially if this competitor is taking the approach of buying out the competition to remove availability, which doesn't give the impression they are a company with goals of being benevolent should they get bigger.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Epic have more than enough fortnite money to make a launcher that's not shit

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd expect EGS exclusivity to be the norm then. People who will buy the game eventually will buy the game eventually. Those are fixed sales since they'd get the same revenue from them either way. It's just a breakdown of the sales lost from people refusing to buy the game ever outweighs the 30% you gain. Which at this point it seems like a ridiculous proposal since every game seems to launch to bigger and bigger numbers regardless of what bullshit the game pulls. People who wait for sales would barely matter since a steam sale is like a year after release and they weren't making bank on them anyways.

But at face value, getting 70% of one Steam sale is only 10% more than you'd make off two copies sold at 100%. So one "never buy" looses you 2.3 sales of a game in revenue. Cool but any converted sale from someone who wouldve bought on Steam but can't wait and buys on EGS offset that in favor of EGS. I guarantee more people will buy from EGS compared to never buying the game. 2.3x more? Yeah, for sure, lol. I'm sure someone could do some clown math for a break even point per 1 million sales at that point. But considering a bulk of a games purchase is at launch it's just skewed so heavily toward EGS exclusivity makes more financial sense.

There's also the percentage that just don't buy on PC and buy on console instead, but again that's the same cut you'd get just launching it on Steam

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›