this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
60 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

40106 readers
153 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Data on search engine market share is available, but I wonder what that looks like for Lemmy users in particular, who I would assume lean more technical than the average user, so probably use DuckDuckGo and alternates more than Google.

I use a mix of DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I'll also use ChatGPT, which can be good if you're careful to verify the answers it gives you as a check against hallucinations. It's useful for short, direct answers without ads or SEO bullshit.

This article on Ars (and if you're not a subscriber, you absolutely should be, as they are the best tech journalists out there) inspired the question: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/06/google-admits-reddit-protests-make-it-harder-to-find-helpful-search-results

Fucking Reddit. Enshittification ruins everything.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I'll give a search on Duck Duck Go, and if I can't find what I need then I'll use Google.

But at this point I'm using Google Bard and ChatGPT more and more, at least at work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Duck duck go. Google for maps

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I've been using Ecosia for a while and liking it. I think the results are usually better than Google and the image search is way more useful, still gives you direct links to the image files. Though most importantly I like planting trees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're all garbage. Content farms and SEO nonsense has been flooding search engines with useless garbage for years. Either that or pages that simply copy forum threads over and over and over so you get a whole results page of what appears to be different sites, but are all a copy of the same forum thread from 2007. Or they grab your search string and then you have a page that looks like it's exactly what you need, only to find out it's scammy bullshit. But AI is making that whole problem exponentially worse.

I've tried DDG many many times over the years. Sometimes it's ok. But overall, most of the results i get just aren't relevant, and it seems like over the last year or two DDG's results have gotten way worse. I always end up back on Google. As crappy as Google is, the results still end up being more relevant overall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

As often as I hear others with the opposite opinion, my experience is very similar to yours. If I want to find the answer to a question fast, I just use Google. If I'm just browsing a new topic, I try DDG first and much of the time end up using Google anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Bing and DDG.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Searxng, reddit, gmap or OSM for mapping.

[–] Tywele 1 points 2 years ago

I use ecosia.org. They are actively doing something regarding the environment (tree planting projects) and are privacy minded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do you know if ecosia is still using google under the hoods?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Apparently not, but the (usable) results are much the same. Ecosia was borrowing from yahoo and bing, but they changed that some years ago.

I have no idea of what or how they're doing it now, but then I also only search explicit things. I never liked the idea of a search engine trying to understand what I was actually looking for, so I state myself clearly in that regard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mugmoor 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I use the Librex instance running on my homelab.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Google and ChatGPT, I tried DDG several years ago, but the results were not good, might try it again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

DuckDuckGo. Its results are much better than Google's in my experience. Whenever I Google something, all I get is a list of online stores I've never heard of, and they have nothing to do with my search input.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Self-hosted SearXNG. Very easy to self-host, and (for the most part) works just fine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I'm interested in that. Does it take a lot of resources (ram, cpu, disk ) ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

DuckDuckGo, and before that, I used ixquick(which is now StartPage).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Currently DuckDuckGo, but I will switch to SearXNG because of this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Because of what? One idiot that broke his search engine somehow?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I use SearXNG and Ecosia.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›