this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
91 points (100.0% liked)

mutual_aid

21972 readers
96 users here now

Users cannot assume that any post has been vetted and must do their own investigation.

RULES:

  1. All mutual aid requests must go in this community.
  2. Mods do not vet individual mutual aid requests. Donate at your own risk.
  3. Do not request donations for funding anything explicitly illegal.
  4. Comments giving unsolicited advice will be removed. (See below)
  5. Comments or posts that are critical of any mutual aid post or user will be removed. (See below)
  6. Posts containing opsec leaks will be removed.

Additionally:

Moderator Pinning Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure how many people were around four years ago for the original drama, but @[email protected] was a banned user from early on the site's history, and I've seen quite a bit of speculation recently that a current frequent poster in c/mutualaid is an alt of hers due to having a similar MO and personal details (such as them both living in the same city)

For context, u/storyofrachel was an unhoused trans woman, who frequently solicited money from the community and had problems with substance abuse. She eventually made a post bragging about scamming money from users here (I myself was one of the users who sent her money) and blowing it on drugs (with a picture of the drugs in question) and a

bunch of homophobic slurs (TW: homophobia, self harm).
She later claimed that her account had been hacked, which frankly I did and do not believe. She was unbanned but later banned for other shit which I don't recall and am unable to reconstruct from the modlog and came back on a bunch of different alts, all of which were banned.

If there's any truth to this, it is deeply fucked that this person is still here, evading her ban and scamming people four years later. As one of the people who was taken advantage of previously (and, possibly, again with this current user!), people should at least be able to make an informed decision with all available context. If we want this community to function, and I say this as someone who has sent hundreds of dollars to people over the years through this community, we should be able to guard against bad actors who are trying to take advantage of the compassion and generosity of our user base.

Edit: There's an Instagram with both usernames on it, publicly available. It's 100% the same person. Not going to post it because I don't want anyone to get doxxed but yeah.

Edit edit: I'm going to go touch grass now. Anyone who is being willfully obtuse about why I made this post can read it again or any of my other comments in this thread

(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I looked over this post like five times... so the "scamming people" is that this user posted in mutual_aid and then spent the money on drugs? And also that they called people slurs once. Am I reading this right? Did this user lie about being homeless at any point?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i mean idk have you guys never given money to a homeless person who said it was their birthday? did you think that was true? would you be mad at them if it wasn't? aggrandize yourself if you have to, but please break free of the austerity mindset you're fucking communists for christssake

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Does Hexbear log IP addresses of login attempts? Is there any definitive way to tell if they're the same people?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wild if true. Do the redacted parts of that first screenshot line up with the original Rachel? Otherwise just a first name is a bit of a stretch IMO

But if it is the same person coming back after, what, three years to hustle four figure sums from a tiny internet forum is... something

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

wtf is the intention behind making this post, except specifically trying to drive the user in question off the site because she did some fucked up stuff 4 years ago and called you a rude word, because it's oviously not an intervention or attempt to help her.

like is it out of some concern that the people who voluntarily gave her money while fully aware of her situation were too stupid to realise that there's a chance she might misuse it or is it just some way to make sure you never have to see her posts again? because there's a much easier solution than the whole "i just think you guys should know" style call out post shit to the latter:

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

God damn. Somehow I missed this one four years ago. Looks like she’s still struggling with life. Sad place to be.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i'm not sure i get what the "scam" is here. was she not open about struggling with addiction, mental health, and homelessness? yeah, sometimes you give money to a homeless person and they spend it on something you don't approve of, and sometimes a mentally ill person acts like an asshole. you kind of just have to suck it up without resolving to unperson them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

also, years ago it was pointed out that there's pretty much no appeals process for people who get banned, and the expectation was that you make a new account and not get caught and not do the same thing you were banned for. i realize that this is just an internet forum and it's not that big a deal but like that's a joke of an accountability process that would be entirely unworkable in a more serious context.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Overall, the average life expectancy of unhoused people is 42 to 52 years old

Rachel could well just be dead by this point

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not scamming anyone. Please stop this.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›