[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6626 readers

1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
Encourage conversation in your post
Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

169

Pick One: Which is your favorite way to read books? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I will die on this hill: listening is not reading. And I love listening to audio books when I have a long drive or something. ereader is what I use 99% of the time though.

[–] ndondo 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why not out of curiosity?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Reading:

n 1: the cognitive process of understanding a written linguistic
           message; "his main reading was detective stories";
           "suggestions for further reading"

I don't think one is better than the other. Just listening is different than reading. It uses different parts of the brain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think there is a similar effect with speed-reading v slow-reading. Slow reading gives me time to mull over and digest what I'm reading, while speed can be good to skim for information.

load more comments (2 replies)