this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
144 points (90.9% liked)
Out of the loop
13345 readers
4 users here now
A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wikileaks is accused of not releasing information that would be harmful to the reputation of Russia.
OK? and that magically makes his other leaks invalid?
If you know for a fact a guy has proof group A eats kittens and group B eats puppies, there's questions to be asked when they guy only releases the kitten info.
maybe because puppy info results in Novichok nerve agent?
So if Puppy Eaters are also assassins, you ignore the puppy eating?
If you value your life, then yes?
So the lesson Kitten Eaters should take is to be more violent?
I have no idea what point your trying to make.
Some information is dangerous.
It's not a hard concept to understand that perhaps the leaker's bias towards what's leaked and what's held back, is fear of an entity that's proven they have no qualms with blatant assassinations.
So I'm not sure if you are trying to disagree with that statement in some way, or your just making random comments.