this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13958 readers
690 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

@[email protected] you're presumably joking about the feasibility of getting some of the energy wasted on food & plastic back out again.

But this is a good article on how renewable hydrocarbons can be used for energy. Of course, modern energy use would probably exceed the forage capacity or new growth wood.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

What energy is wasted? The energy is still there, it's just a bit annoying to burn (lots of big waxy molecules) so this is a method that breaks it down chemically and makes it easier to burn.

Biomass as fuel is a solution looking for a problem, and trades soil health for nothing compared to electrification. Dumping biomass in deep anoxic lakes might at least reduce the quantity of GHG emitted as opposed to being 'neutral'. Get some solar panels and wind generators and get hydrogen with hydrolysis (and then turn that into whatever you want), or nuclear (Hello China).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also hydrogen gas is used to make gasoline. If fossil fuel production was heavily reduced I'm guessing it would be trivial to replace part of naptha production with hydrogen from renewable sources?

Maybe it would be redundant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Not trivial but certainly possible

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)