this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

videos

23051 readers
88 users here now

Breadtube if it didn't suck.

Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.

Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.

There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.

A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

just a bunch of dudes, checking corners with their bows drawn, getting shot by a crossbow-machinegun nest

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (11 children)

I’m not enough of a medievalist to speak to the differences but couldn’t you view the crusader states as early attempts at settler-colonialism?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Not really no, trying to view them through the lens if settler colonialism is an anachronistic perspective. The closest you could get is from the perspective of the italian trading states which had a driving commercial interest, but even this doesn't really hold.

The crusades functioned under different economic imperatives that don't really conform to the capitalist structures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The crusades functioned under different economic imperatives that don’t really conform to the capitalist structures.

I hope this isn't a strange question or deflection. I'd say 99% of people would say what Christopher Columbus did was colonialism, but it was also before the advent of capitalism. Do Marxists not see Colombus's project as colonial because capitalism wasn't around, or what's going on there?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The operation of sailing ships necessarily tended to take a capitalist form. Not only were the ships expensive, necessitating partnership forms that presaged the joint stock company [Banaji, 2016], shipping was, in the precapitalist economies, the main instance of production by means of powered machines. The sailing ship used wind power to replace what would otherwise have required a large number of galley slaves. In this it shared one of the archetypal traits of capitalist industry—the replacement of human labor with powered devices. The anomaly of merchant capital existing in antiquity and the Middle Ages should be understood as arising from shipping being the first field to which such machines were applied. The profit of merchant capital should then be understood as a special early and precocious case of the production of relative surplus value.

By using sail-power shippers in, say, first-century Italy could convert grapes for wine into Egyptian corn for sale in Italy such that the labor that would go into growing the grapes, plus the labor of shipping, was less than the labor that would be required to grow the same amount of corn in Italy. To the extent that the corn imported from Alexandria entered into the subsistence of slaves exploited in Italy, the cheapening of corn would have decreased the fraction of time that slaves had to work to produce their subsistence, increasing the number of hours a week that yielded an income for the slave owners. A portion of this increased surplus was then appropriated by the sea captains and shippers as monetary profit.

-Paul Cockshott, How The World Works

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)