this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1596 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

37904 readers
199 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago (17 children)

This seems like a pretty dumb thing to do to try to wipe out a browser with 2% marketshare.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Obviously there a people in charge now who will never understand the Streisand effect. They could have kept it quiet and just... allow... the technical adept users to do their thing. Now, they are the laughing stock and get unwanted attention. Also, from my layman understanding, this shit won't fly in the EU at all.

Or, to say it differently: This is the best thing to happen to Mozilla in quite a long time and I'm a fan.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I'm out of the loop. What happened? Did someone decompile their code and find definitive proof of a throttle for Firefox?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

some explanation

To be fair, they used setTimeout() and not thread.sleep() because the latter isn't possible out of the box in JS ^^

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Users who have ad blockers installed may experience suboptimal viewing

Yeah let me turn off the adblocker just for having an even more suboptimal viewing due to ads. They're lunatics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the explainer! Also, Google's response is such a crock of shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)