this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23383 readers
98 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Oh damn, have I been fooled? Isn't this what people dunk on JK Rowling for?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

to be fair, this is exaggerated in the meme - Theodead is actually Theodred (turning "dred" into "dead" is a bit tortured), and Orctank is really Orthanc (which again required some extra work to make the joke).

The only really egregious one is Grima Wormtongue, except even that one isn't so bad, since Wormtongue is explicitly supposed to be a nickname given to the guy, not what he actually calls himself (although Grima itself can actually mean "mask" or "apparition", but you'd need to be a linguistics nerd to know that). Saruman sounding kind of close to Sauron is maybe a bit confusing, but I feel like the closeness of the two names is somewhat exaggerated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

I figured that since Tolkien was a linguistics guy that he used some roots where those things more directly translated, like '-dred' means 'dead' and '-thanc' means pit or enclosure of some sort. Oh wow, imagine if JK Rowling was a linguistics nut, she probably would hide some (more) heinous things in names.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)