this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
136 points (82.7% liked)
Anarchism
2253 readers
2 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Love Anarchist philosophy, I think it's literally radical as hell, but holy shit Anarchists are just as whiny as Tankies sometimes.
Rather than posting infighting memes or debating online, try to educate and learn more yourself, build up your community, actually do something. These memes are just cringe.
That's the funny thing to me about commies or anarchists arguing with each other online, I feel like most serious people in both groups don't even bother with that bs, and work together IRL at actions without thinking about it.
Yes, it's either the terminally online, or the people that have managed to actually make it far enough that it even matters. In the west, it absolutely doesn't matter, except perhaps in revolutionary strategy, ie Anarcho-Syndicalism vs Vanguardism vs etc.
Day to day, the same exact praxis persists: educate yourself, improve your life and understanding, advocate for positive change, unionize, build up your community, and educate others. It doesn't matter what leftist tendency you personally prefer, the praxis on a day to day level is the same.
Also at this point both syndies and vanguardists have the clearest path to power through radical unionism, including tenant, student, and municipal unionism
Revolutionarily, I agree. Especially in such a non-unionized country like the US, Syndicalism seems more apt than hoping for a Vanguard Party.
???
Vanguard parties will always emerge as some proles will be radicalized sooner than others, the difference in union strategy is that syndies want less centralization between the radical unions and dont percieve themselves as the vanguard.
Depends on what you consider to be a Vanguard, whether you mean an actual, defined party or simply more educated, radicalized proles leading others.
I guess I dont see the difference outside of the latter being less organized and as a function of that being less effective.
That's exactly the difference, organizational structure and levels. Effectiveness or otherwise notwithstanding.