this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
134 points (92.9% liked)

Australian Politics

1604 readers
35 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (20 children)

Why couldn't you have said this earlier? Then I could have easily judged you as the narrow minded racist that you are. The "yes" vote would most definitely help our first nations people's, or can you provide a different reason as to why the overwhelming majority of them voted "yes"? Go on, I love seeing idiots struggle... And that brings up another point related to your mindless drivel, are you saying that first nations people are racist towards themselves when they voted "yes"? They are hated because they are different, not because of a potential panel of people that helps the govt make fair and balanced decisions that affect them.

I genuinely despise you right now. You started off being a bit confused, now you are just spewing right wing non truths that are somehow worse than what was printed leading up to the vote. I wish you were never made a citizen here, we have enough prejudiced, close minded people here, we don't need more... And if you don't like this being directed at you, think of the first nations people in our country who have had to experience this for centuries. Maybe this will shake your core and give you some compassion. I'm doubtful it will due to your military grade stupidity, but I can still hope.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (19 children)

Sorry, you do not listen to my arguments. And I fail to see what of what I say make me a racist. I always argued for quality of all Australian.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (18 children)

I've countered all your arguments. Your main one seems to be that this was somehow racist when the whole point of it was to counter centuries old, ingrained racism. You are so fundamentally wrong you should be committed. You're either a die hard racist or dumb as fuck, I honestly can't tell to the point that I want to study you. Either way, you don't represent what Australia is supposed to stand for and I suggest you take a long, hard look at yourself if you want to integrate here. Cos if I hear you say this shit in public, I'm gonna call you on it. Not physically, but I will rage and make sure you know exactly how badly the words you say affect people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your main one seems to be that this was somehow racist when the whole point of it was to counter centuries old, ingrained racism. My point that you can't counter racism with racism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not racist to help a race that has historically been done wrong by. The whole point was to lift them up to the same level as everyone else, not elevate them to some privileged position. I'm sick of repeating this, stop repeating right wing propoganda that has no basis in reality you racist fuck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess we reach to root of our disparagement. I do not accept racism in any form. You seem accept it as method of fixing old wrong doing. Dixi.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The dictionary disagrees:

racism [ rey-siz-uhm ] noun a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.

Also called in·sti·tu·tion·al rac·ism [in-sti-too-shuh-nl rey-siz-uhm, -tyoo-], struc·tur·al rac·ism [struhk-cher-uhl rey-siz-uhm], sys·tem·ic rac·ism [si-stem-ik rey-siz-uhm] . a policy, system of government, etc., that is associated with or originated in such a doctrine, and that favors members of the dominant racial or ethnic group, or has a neutral effect on their life experiences, while discriminating against or harming members of other groups, ultimately serving to preserve the social status, economic advantage, or political power of the dominant group.

There is nothing racist about making the playing field level. It is racist to want to keep a race below another, which is what you're advocating. So, I say again, you're the only racist one here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We have different dictionaries. From Webster:

2 Prejudice or discrimination based upon race.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's neither prejudice or discrimination though, so you've fucked that up too.

Edit: hang the fuck on. This is a link to the Webster definition and it doesn't say that. Stop making shit up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How it is not discrimination if treatment is different based on race?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Since you love Webster so much (see my edit above): discrimination noun dis·​crim·​i·​na·​tion di-ˌskri-mə-ˈnā-shən Synonyms of discrimination 1 a : prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment racial discrimination

Because it's not prejudicial, that's why.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry. if it not prejudicial than it justified. How you justify one race over other?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Oh ffs. How are you not getting that it was to make the races equal because first nations people are well below the rest of us? I've met rocks smarter than you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you now claiming that they are inferior than other humans. 😱 So they need help to get to same level? Man, this it pure racism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, your English comprehension just sucks. Right now, the playing field isn't level. First nations people are below everyone else in that regard. Do you understand now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Quoting you.

because first nations people are well below the rest of us? How you can interpreted this in any other way ? Why first nation need different treatment form any other disadvantaged group? ( This is exactly what was missing in SBS article you linked in other branch)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, and? Your English sucks. In context, most english speakers could infer what's implied. You can't. That's on you, not me, mate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I tend to disagree, you are not communicating clearly. As you can't provide anything meaningful and been so useless. I'm done here. And just one last advice. Learn how to communicate, yelling, repeating same shit over and over again and insults does not help you or you cause. Good thing that some other guys step up and provide some useful comments, so I can't just dismiss all "yes" voters as been same as you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, I don't speak at a grade 5 level. Again, that's on you, not me. Take some English classes or fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

And yet, here you are, still interacting, you racist.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)