this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
235 points (95.4% liked)

Games

21116 readers
287 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (38 children)

If 90% of gamers can't play a game, is it still worth releasing it like that?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (9 children)

at 4K/High Settings

Do you believe 90% of gamers will be playing at 4K/High settings?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I think I'm pretty confident in saying most people aren't interested in sub 60 FPS, especially if it's at 1080p and looking the way it does (which is mostly flat and unimpressive)

That's the most shocking part, the high-end hardware needed to brute force a 1080p game at acceptable framerates

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

By "people" you mean "the kind of wankers that fellate Gamers Nexus."

Cities:Skylines has always had a frame rate that takes the strugglebus to work.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)