this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
253 points (99.6% liked)
chat
8438 readers
160 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Terry Goodkind's books are a horrifyingly amped up Ayn Rand fever dream with swords and extra sexual violence, so I'd rather source a similar quote somewhere else.
That's on you. Here's a glowing endorsement from Randroids themselves:
https://www.atlassociety.org/post/the-randian-fantasies-of-terry-goodkind
There's some
to that quote and its context, which is a lot like Ayn Rand works too: it implies that the protagonist (and the reader) are now privileged keepers of secret information that amounts to "you are smart, everyone else outside of the secret club is stupid" which is poison for solidarity or any sort of class consciousness.
Here, from the author himself, thanks to @[email protected] for finding it.
https://cgi1.usatoday.com/mchat/20030805003/tscript.htm
You don't get a pass to invalidate everyone else pointing out, with evidence from the author himself, what he deliberately put into his work, no matter how willfully ignorant you now choose to be.
I'll quote your own totally nonpolitical message you got from your very nonpolitical book:
That's you. Right now. You believe what you want to believe, because Terry Goodkind said you were very smart and a wizard for nodding along while consuming the product.
You can willfully ignore the political ideology of the author and the messages he deliberately put into his books if you wish.
I went as far as I could and what I saw utterly disgusted me. I only later looked up what I had already seen for myself and said "oh, that makes a lot of sense" regarding Goodkind's political beliefs and what he was pushing on people, especially people that wanted to believe there was no political message at all while still absorbing it.
I was a huge fan as a teen, I’ve read all the books, and how my guy can’t see the anti-communist randian libertarianism is frankly astonishing. It’s not subtle, and once I started learning actual politics I recognized what the books were about almost immediately. They were a huge part of my teens and early twenties, but they’re exactly as you describe, and super easy to recognize as such.
When I was still a young liberal and nowhere near a leftist, I did the same: "Wizard's First Rule" was recommended to me by an adult because I seemed so very smart for my age according to them.
I didn't even finish the book because in my gut it horrified me, even the narcissistic arrogance of the "first rule" itself:
The cheap trick of that is telling the reader that they're very smart and a wizard if only they read the book and nod along to the message, and everyone else is inferior because they're not part of the secret not-Randian Randian secret club.
It's very telling to me that the @[email protected] is believing exactly what they want to believe and refuse to see evidence put right in front of their face from the author himself.
I had to go through my edgy atheist phase before I wised up. That rule and the sixth one “the only sovereign you can allow to rule you is reason” were almost Sam Harris-esque, so naturally I continued to think they were brilliant. Took a few years to go from that to ML, and realizing what those books were was a big step.
It's fucking rich that the kind of people that decide for the rest of us what "reason" is tend to be the ones peddling cryptocurrency grifts and seasteading escapist fantasies, or just rob each other in the name of "Effective Altruism" like Sam Bankman-Fried.