this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
56 points (93.8% liked)

Futurology

3075 readers
103 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At first, an in-ear phone and language translator, while useful, might not seem compelling. But take things a bit further. This relies on a mini-computer and connection to the internet in the hearing aid. What if that allowed you to connect to Chat-GPT? Or future more powerful versions of it. That might be more compelling. Sci-fi has often envisioned cyborgs in the future. Maybe one day people will look back at stuff like this and think it was the first baby steps of that technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Hmm, I guess, potentially interesting for migrants / asylum seekers, who struggle with even just understanding the language.

Can't really imagine anyone buying these for phone calls, when regular earphones, or you know, just holding your phone to your ear, already exist.
It's kind of even an anti-feature for phone calls, if people can't see these hearing aids. Everyone will think you're crazy, talking to yourself...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

My partner speaks a native language which is extremely rare - only a few million people worldwide speak the language. So uncommon that it's hard to find software to teach me the language. A real-life babble-fish would make life a million times easier when visiting her family who doesn't speak English (I assume, since I know that AI including Chat is capable of translating to and from the language fairly well with good grammar, but I doubt that it would be able to easily synthesize speech patterns for a rare language compared to converting their language to English. But I could be wrong lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What language is it, sounds interesting

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

One of the Baltics

load more comments (6 replies)