United States | News & Politics

3077 readers

1278 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Democrats Force Reading of GOP’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” After Key Senate Vote (truthout.org)

submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Democrats are hoping to draw out the bill’s passage while highlighting provisions expected to harm US families.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

lol, no....they don't know how to filibuster, they're just going to be compliant & complicit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

So, the fact that they already did the longest standing filibuster in US history missed your attention? The fact that they found a way to effectively filibuster this filibuster exempt bill is irrelevant? I guess you get points for being devoted to your narrative. How many Senate Democrats voted with the Republicans anyways?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Crazy me, thinking this filibuster less bill could get filibustered....so silly of me.

Maybe it would have already been rewritten if Schumer and the other turds didn't let the temporary budget pass and forced a shutdown.

IT IS ALL BULLSHIT THEATER

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The filibuster literally can't be used on a reconciliation bill. It's just not a thing. Democrats used other Senate rules to effectively filibuster the bill by forcing a full reading on the Senate floor. It's not as effective as a filibuster, but it served the same purpose.

I'm sorry, but I just can't take your demands of Democrats seriously when you can't bother to even RTFA to understand what you're demanding. And this is from someone who lothes the neoliberal establishment and especially Schumer. I'm entirely in your corner on the temporary budget, but that was not part of your previous comment or my response.