this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
131 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

39576 readers
254 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (8 children)

I have no idea what point you're trying to make. That means they have good intentions with the data they're collecting about the users of their mobile apps?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That mean they have at least less bad intentions than chatgpt at least the opened their model on contrary of chatgpt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It does not mean that at all. Nothing about choosing to release a model for free or not has any bearing on whether or not the app will respect the privacy of its users.

OpenAI could feel like they're making enough money off of their proprietary model that they don't need to collect data (I'm not saying this is likely), while DeepSeek could have released the model for free hoping mass adoption leads to more app downloads and more data to harvest. I don't assume either has good intentions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Thanks for putting other word in my mouth. I never told any of both have good intention, but at least deepseek didn't promise to release the model to change it's mind and close source it. Feel that it is a little better than chatgpt, since they didn't shit on the face of the community yet. I am sure both collect data, and I wouldn't thrust them with sensitive informations.

load more comments (5 replies)