this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
1297 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

8296 readers
2664 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Really don't know why you're getting downvoted. Getting a transcript and summary of an hour long meeting that you weren't at is so much easier than relying on someone taking and sending you notes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (8 children)

If you get sufficient value out of a 30 second summary of an hour long meeting, then why have the hour long meeting?

(h)(n) + (t)(p) = W
(h length of meeting in hours) x (n number of people in the meeting) + (t number of hours prepping the meeting) x (p number of people prepping the meeting) = W number of work hours spent on this meeting. Multiply W by the average hourly wage. That's how much money the meeting cost. And that doesn't factor in the cost of productivity loss because everybody could've been doing something useful with that time instead.

If it could've otherwise been ten minutes of writing an email and five minutes per worker reading and understanding it, then how is it anything other than an efficiency gain to just make that meeting an email? Instead, we're still putting the meeting together just to then pay in resources and possibly subscription cost to have the meeting summarized instead of just having the host do it in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just an off-the-cuff example, a business review with a client. I'm involved in making the deck that's being shown, so I already know the talking points from our side; the only thing that's relevant to me is the client's response. The meeting might be 45 minutes of us presenting and 15 minutes of them responding, so if I can get a quick summary of those responses, I can save all that time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but you know how else you could give that information to the client and have them respond back?

By emailing the deck and asking for their thoughts.

We don't really need to coordinate having an hour window in everybody's schedule anymore.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Reading through a random deck is not remotely the same as watching a presentation

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)