#MarkCarney #BillC-2 #BillC-5
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
8 points (75.0% liked)
CanadaPolitics
2822 readers
5 users here now
Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My concern is a suspicion that a lot of the support for people like Trump, Poilievre, and other populists comes from the fact that 'progressives' don't even acknowledge that the sclerotic ways of modern govt are doing things like driving up the cost of housing. In the third part of this series I'll be talking about this. There's a graph from Naxos polling that I find is really interesting---it seems to show a lot of the people who used to support Poilievre have moved not so much to Carney as to 'undecided'.
Please note, I'm not completely sold on Carney. But I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt right now. I'm also of the opinion that if we won't support politicians who at least say the right things, we are never going to get anyone in office that will do a good job.
In what world are progressives not the ones talking about the issues with housing and governance? That makes 0 sense.
Not quite sure what you mean by this comment, but there's lots of talk. But most of seems to me to be deflections from admitting that we need to change zoning rules that keep developers from building new housing. The common refrains are things like "developers won't build affordable housing", "it's because of financialization", "I'm all for more density---just not in this neighbourhood", "I just don't think it's fair for people who already own their own home to pay for the infrastructure needed to build new housing", etc. I've put a lot work into researching this subject for a lot of articles, and when I looked into all of these things I found that they really aren't the problem---it's the nest of legalization that makes the process of home-building super slow and piles a lot of unnecessary costs onto the developers.
Unfortunately, a great many 'progressives' are baby boomers who already own their own homes and they simply don't understand the housing crisis because it doesn't directly affect them.
Speaking of flashbacks to almost 20 years ago, Paul Krugman used to talk about what he called Flatland and the Zoned Zone. The same forces were at work then, they've just gotten steadily worse and I guess as suburban sprawl took over across the land, almost every place in Canada where it makes any sense to build (and many where it doesn't) got itself to some extent "zoned."