this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
529 points (97.8% liked)

Cyanide & Happiness

633 readers
421 users here now

About

Hello fellow Cyanide and Happiness fans!

Cyanide & Happiness (C&H) is a webcomic created by Rob DenBleyker, Kris Wilson, Dave McElfatrick and Matt Melvin. The comic has been running since 2005 and is published on the website explosm.net along with animated shorts in the same style. Matt Melvin left C&H in 2014, and several other people have contributed to the comic and to the animated shorts

Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_%26_Happiness

Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, media, cool stuff about the authors, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s Cyanide & Happiness related!

History

@[email protected] started this community and wrote:

About this community and how I post the comics… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips. Of course these days you can read your favorite comics online instead of a newspaper, but I love the nostalgia of reading the daily comics. Anyway, one of my favorite current comics is Cyanide and Happiness and I will be posting the daily release from their website (https://explosm.net/) and a an extra or two randoms.

Related Communities

Subscribe to all the daily comic communities!

Fine Print

All comics posted are freely available online. In no way is the poster claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

I don't understand your comment then. It reads that people should stop using dollars to buy stuff like bread and just buy bit coin instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

It was phrased as a question on purpose, to get you to think about it.

Your assertion is that no one would spend their Bitcoin on bread, and they'd instead use fiat currency. I'm asking you: why would they take their capital, regardless of what form it's in, and spend it on bread, if they knew they could hold onto that capital and it would appreciate in value?

The answer is very obvious: they need to eat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I see what you're saying now. You're basically describing deflation. Yeah people would buy bread (and other essentials to live) but as their currency would be more valuable tomorrow they'd put off buying non essentials. In fiat currency this is seen as prices dropping in bitcoin is seen as the value of the bitcoin going up.

Why would I buy a non essential today when I know it'll be 10% cheaper tomorrow?

Why would I use my bitcoin to buy anything non essential when if I wait until the next spike it'll be 30% more valuable than today?

The answer of course is I wouldn't. I'll buy it later when it's 10% cheaper for my fiat currency or 30% cheaper if I'm using bitcoin. It's not an essential so why spend more to get he same thing.

Currency needs stability in fiat currency to much instability is described in terms of inflation and deflation. Because bitcoin is more of an investment than a currency it's described as it going up and down.

As there's no intrinsic value to bitcoin and because there's no central backing working to maintain the stability it'll never be anything other than a speculative investment for people who're already rich or the few who get lucky to make some actual useable money off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People would buy more than just bare essentials because people want things. This doesn't exist in a vacuum -- at this very moment, people are using fiat currency to buy all kinds of things they don't need instead of investing it in some kind of appreciating asset.

As there's no intrinsic value to bitcoin

There's no intrinsic value to fiat currency. I'm not sure why you keep saying this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People would buy more than just bare essentials because people want things

People would buy less and ecconomies (rightly or wrongly) rely quite a lot on people buying more than they need. There's a reason economics are scared of deflation. The fear of deflation was why interest rates where so low after the 08 crash and even lower during the pandemic.

Also, other appreciating assets have some use within the wider economy. Shares you're ingesting in a company that produces goods or services so they can spend that money on growing their business, bonds/guilts you're enabling the issuer to borrow more to do whatever they need to do with that money (in the case of government bonds think roads, hospitals and bombs).

There's no intrinsic value to fiat currency.

True. There isn't to bitcoin either. What fiat has is stability and public confidence. When it looses stability that's when things are bad. Bitcoin has proved itself extremely volatile, its about 16 years to become stable and it never has. Because bitcoin coin is so dominant in the crypto market I can't see any crypo becoming stable while it exists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Also, other appreciating assets have some use within the wider economy.

Sure, but that has nothing to do with what I said about them.

Again, you'll notice people are spending their capital on things they don't need all day, rather than than investing it in appreciating assets. Why are they doing that? Why would they buy things they don't need today, when they could invest in an appreciating asset and be able to afford 10 of those things tomorrow?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)