this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8177 readers
690 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Doesn’t this framing serve the petit bourgeois YIMBY luxury housing developers and the DNC’s new neoliberal, deregulatory “abundance” movement? We don’t have homeless for a lack of housing so much as a glut of vacancies and a lack of affordability, which are intimately tied to each other.

Not that NIMBYs aren’t problem at all; they are. But “YIMBY” has been co-opted by bourgeois/neoliberal interests. It’s an astroturfed movement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Maybe, just maybe, it might be a bit more nuanced than you realize.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Indeed, homelessness in the US is massively more nuanced than “we need to build more homes.” Simply building more housing will hardly help at all, because there are already many houses & apartments intentionally left vacant in order to manipulate prices, because the real estate and banking industries are only interested in line go up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)