this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
71 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

39254 readers
201 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I don't even need to read the article to know that they didn't actually say that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

But they did, just with different words.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

So they didn't..

The title should quote what they actually said rather than putting their own bias on it. You'd call them out for twisting your words like that. Hold yourself to the same standards.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Except the title isn't a quote, it's a paraphrase - hence why there are no quotation marks.

You could say "Midnitte to OpinionHaver: their opinion is stupid and wrong", even if the actual statement was, "Midnitte said OpinionHaver was wrong and making incorrect judgments about language".

Apple's statement is probably much longer than would fit into a sensible title bar...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)