this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
132 points (100.0% liked)
WomensStuff
339 readers
171 users here now
Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.
Rules…
- Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
- Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
- Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
- No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend [email protected] for that, but here is an escape from it.
- New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Methinks someone doesn't know what "mansplaining" is.
Here, let me break down why that's a mansplain:
That's the mansplain. Someone who doesn't know shit corrected a woman who literally knows for certain without at any point considering that, perhaps, the woman is right.
Because when are women ever right?
Now fuck off the channel.
(Yo so I know I'm not supposed to be commenting but can I just ask a quick question? Won't make a habit of it but this kinda blew my mind.)
Wait, so does mansplaining require the man to be incorrect? I (for about a year) dated a woman who used to accuse me of mansplaining every time I would be excitedly ADHDsplaining a niche interest, and now I'm kiiinda super self-conscious about talking about...well anything, unless I know the other person has a decent idea of the subject already.
So...was she using it right, or wrong and she's just a jerk who wanted to hurt me?
I'd believe it, she did threaten to shoot me (like, not for a good reason that would be legal, for spending my own money on comics that I could afford), so it wouldn't be too out of character. But as a result I may have misunderstood this term for oohhh about 7yr now... Like I said I know I'm not supposed to comment and I'm sorry but can you elaborate on the meaning/appropriate application?
Mansplaining is generally when the man is incorrect while explaining something to a woman that she's the expert in, yes. Like telling a woman "you obviously need to read McCarty et al" when she is McCarty et al (to cite a famous example).
Oh really? I always thought mansplaining involves also true facts that are explained to me even though i defintiely know and they know already i do. It happens to me a lot since i am a scientist...
For example during corona a carpenter explained me how a PCR test works, knowing I studied something with biology and already did PCR during my studies myself. He was right in his a little superfacial description of it. Still, i just was super baffled, that someone i just told i studied and did that already myself, who himself is not from the field and never did it, feels the urge to explain the method to me as if he was my highschoolteacher. To me thats mansplaining as well, even though he was right in his description. But maybe i got the Definition wrong. If thats not mansplaining, how do you call it then? It happens Quite often to me .... (Corona was special though, suddenly everyone was a scientist. :D).