this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
217 points (96.6% liked)

Funny

10365 readers
748 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I forgot how this direction of philosophy was called. Avenarius was one of the main names... But it was debunked by philosophers themselves somewhere in the middle of the XIX century.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

My go to response is usually “what do you mean by that?” Generally people say stuff like that to imply it’s impossible to “know” anything. But does it really matter if this is a dream or not?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well, yes. Actually it does matter. Modern materialistic approach lets us assume that physical laws (no matter if we know them or not) are universal and applicable to anything. "Dream" concept leaves us in total chaos without even a theoretical chance to figure out how things work. It even has totally crazy synchronization problems between different "dreamers" if there are a few of them. There isn't a single question that is answered by Machism. Absolute religion-tier stupidity.

So it does matter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is my thought. If we’re living in some dreamscape, why is physics so ruthlessly inflexible?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's not. Maybe we are all tiny parts of same consciousness that creates the dream, which makes it consistent based on our shared expectations, or shared subconscious, or whatever connection it is that makes us one. Or something along these lines.

That would explain the consistency without relying upon rigid materialist laws.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Physics isn’t solved, so I don’t think it’s fair to call it ruthlessly inflexible. https://youtu.be/nn94mn8ozOI

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)