this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
84 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22681 readers
222 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Until someone has a really good technical explanation of how this would be theoretically possible I remain highly skeptical of these types of claims.

Not that it's impossible for it to happen but in my own personal research or voting machines and how they work and the starlink connection. The internet is not used to send voting results anywhere. They're loaded on the machine and have to be unloaded from the machine.

As far as I'm aware the internet connection is only used to update the options on the machines and can't be used to comprise these machines.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I couldn't read the whole thing cause it was so crazy but the substack in the other comment does have a hypothesis about the logistics. There is more details in the link but basically they think it was done via power bar?

ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.

If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment—without ever modifying certified election software.

I hope there is a talk about this clever attack at defcon or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean thats assuming default behavior and no hardening on the OS layer.

Still this is a super interesting attack vector and I would love to hear more about it. Here's hoping we get a decent explanation at Defcon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I managed to hop through the rest of the substack. The author further speculates that Elon Musk can control UPSes from satellite using "lasers". (Mention of which is a "breadcrumb" that those elites can't help but leave for us.)

DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.

From that moment on:

  • Commands could be sent from orbit
  • Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
  • Compromised devices could be triggered remotely

To support these ostentatious claims, they just have the graphs about how badly Kamala Harris lost. And of course the lack of evidence is actually evidence itself because of a perfect, error-proof "ballot scrubbing" technology; another hidden in plain sight clue. So forensic evidence is impossible. Hence the charts.

Hope they demo this whole chain of events during their talk (or in court), that would be cool. It would be a lot more convincing than all these loser charts.

load more comments (4 replies)