this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
42 points (95.7% liked)

Linux

7932 readers
701 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This all seems to make sense. Ditching legacy and rarely used code that next to no one uses (and some that was temporary to begin with.)

Nothing stopping anyone else from creating things to handle gnome without systemd but also making the workload easier and one might argue more secure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, I generally agree; I'm a big fan of systemd on Linux.

However, on BSD this does sound unfortunately likely to be painful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Anyone developing desktop for BSD will likely just gravitate to xfce or similar I bet. I honestly am not sure what ghostbsd or midnight or others package by default now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

I'm not either, I've never even ran a BSD desktop... But I support the BSD desktop existing and wish it well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)