this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2533 readers
17 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (11 children)

how has microSD not died yet

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No real alternatives in that form factor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The form factor is kind of pointless though, I can think of maybe two devices I own where a full sized sd card wouldn't fit and be more convenient

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Smartphones can't fit a regular sized SD slot, so microSD is the default (if a smartphone devices even supports memory cards).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean I think mine could, but even if it couldn't I would have no problem with it being the thickness of like a Palm m505 which easily fits a full sized card on a pocket sized device

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I am just saying how things are. I am not particularly obsessed about thickness and I have a phone which supports microSD (which is not that common these days).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are UFS cards. They aren't as fast as SD Express cards, but 1200 MB/s is still plenty fast for a phone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why would anybody adopt a newer standard with no backwards compatibility and slower speeds?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What could even warrant "high speeds" from a damned phone? I can't think of a single thing that would tax an SD card that I'd be doing on a phone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

video recording/editing (some phones can record 4k at high frame rates) , gaming, general responsiveness. I know that we as tech (and especially linux) people don't really understand that but a lot of people are using their phones for a whole load of things now and especially with things now. Also the argument why you would choose UFS would be higher speeds. The real argument for MicroSD Express is backwards compatibility.

Also also I'm looking forwards to being able to run SBC from a MicroSD Express card so it's at least somewhat faster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are still a lot faster than normal SD cards. I've never seen any phone that works with SD Express cards, but there were a few that worked with UFS cards.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

If you are a phone manufacturer you can either choose MicroSD cards which are the most common and the cheapest, MicroSD Express Cards which are more expensive but faster and backwards compatible or UFS which nobody has ever heard of.

load more comments (8 replies)