this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
516 points (96.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7038 readers
783 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In my country, it's called "voting for the fox because the rooster is crowing out of tune".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 9 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

they can't get representation like they could have if they had their own party and could win their own seats

Run-off voting would prevent the worst by turning the presidential elections into FPTP while the rest remain free to vote for your preferred party

For example, you could vote for Somalia Concerns Concord and it could win a seat or two from new York or California, then vote for Democrats when the 2nd presidential vote is held because no party had a majority beforehand

[–] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

you didn't read anything I said

And if you did, you missed the point

Point was: prevent the worst by using this system, which can easily be adopted by any government that originally had a FPTP system into a system with two elections for electing seats and another for run-off presidential elections

Though, because of gerrymandering and how the system for electing seats may still be FPTP, it'll still be damn awful

I think Britain uses this system for something to research if you're interested

[–] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I’m Canadian. I’m familiar with FPTP

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)