this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1566 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Littleproud said his party remained committed to the introduction of nuclear power in Australia, saying renewable energy had lost its social licence and country communities wanted change.

Yes, this is definitely what the election results showed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Regional seats often held for or swung to the LNP. The election results aren't as much of a glowing endorsement for renewables as you suggest. Still, it is rich for that statement to be coming from the Nationals, considering that their long history of lies about renewables are partly to blame for the loss of their social license.

[–] null_dot 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Has renewable energy really lost its social license?

Farmers don't like wind because all their neighbours are putting up noisy turbines.

Meanwhile every house in my street has solar because it's a no-brainer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Advance Australia

I'm not familiar with them so I looked them up. First sentence on the 'Our Story' page: "In 2018, woke politicians and elitist activist groups .."

That's enough. [close tab] Fucking bigots.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Bakers Delight donated to them.

Probably more companies to, but Bakers Delight has been the most inconvenient. I haven't been able to find good bread anywhere else (or indeed, even at Bakers Delight these days).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't know why solar isn't mandatory for all new constructions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rooftop solar causes some issues for the grid and especially with every person getting their own battery it's not very efficient.

On rural properties it would make sense to mandate them, but it would also be political suicide.

[–] null_dot 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aren't the issues it causes mostly because the grid was designed to deliver power from plants?

I mean, aren't they solvable problems?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't really know. I just know there's some kind of issue with that.

And regardless it's true that it'd be a waste of resources to duplicate a "margin-for-error" on every single house to ensure the fridge keeps running all year round.

[–] null_dot 1 points 1 month ago

Not really. If the solar on people's roofs is part of the network. The network needs to be able to manage peaks and troughs in demand no matter how the power is produced.

load more comments (11 replies)