Science

23442 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

astrology is random, so it corresponds to reality more than personality psychology, a project of bourgeois eugenicists (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Science is incapable of ever being truthful because every scientist is an amoral wannabee friend of Jeffrey Epstein. These nerds literally take lessons in school to learn how to beg for patronage to do research. Of course their studies usually end up being about managerial bourgeois praxis like using skull shape measurements to categorize workers. That's what personality psychology is about at the end of the day, Brave New World style eugenics with humane empathy for wage slaves.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (4 children)

people are jumping down your throat because astrology hate is usually just unexamined misogyny/queerphobia

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (2 children)

Okay that’s true, but on the flip side you got people trying to stan astrology so hard they end up saying ridiculous crap like this.

Science is incapable of ever being truthful because every scientist is an amoral wannabee friend of Jeffrey Epstein. These nerds literally take lessons in school to learn how to beg for patronage to do research. Of course their studies usually end up being about managerial bourgeois praxis like using skull shape measurements to categorize workers. That’s what personality psychology is about at the end of the day, Brave New World style eugenics with humane empathy for wage slaves.

And I’ll repeat myself, if you’re gonna demand hard evidence for my claim you should present hard evidence for yours. If there’s evidence that it’s TOTALLY harmless I’m all ears.

If all you have are anecdotes my anecdotes are equally valid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

You know I didn't invoke evidence right? you implied its existence and I called you out for making shit up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

You know I admitted my evidence was totally anecdotal right? And you still made a claim, I made a counter claim, I’m beholden to the same standard of evidence you abided by for your initial claim.

load more comments (1 replies)