this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23362 readers
223 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was watching this for a project and I noticed how much better the cinematography was and how much more it was stylized than BHC. It seems like a weird photography choice for the sequel of an action comedy movie. Then I found out the director was Tony Scott and it made much more sense. This isn't even all of the great shots in this movie. It has no business being this good. Don't worry though they fixed the good cinematography problem for Beverly Hills Cop 3. In fact they fixed a lot of stuff with that one.

(ACAB includes Axel Foley)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tony Scott was an all-timer. I've always maintained that he was a better filmmaker than Ridley.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He was willing to get weird with his films. Domino and Man on Fire have a lot of experimenting with their cinematography and editing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Domino is one of my favorite films. Maybe I give it extra love because it is so underrated, but what a fun film with a very stylized look.