this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13916 readers
802 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

lol owned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (23 children)

Understandable, but probably a slight overreaction.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I gotta say I'm a little unsettled by all the people acting like it's a proportional response

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly baffling, I think most people either didn't read the article or don't understand how awful being set on fire is.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's FAFO because he said "go on, do it", i think we'd be more horrified if he made any attempt to flee or deescalate before he was on fire.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

According to the article he was "heavily intoxicated", not really a good time to be making life changing decisions like if you want to have 5 gallons of petrol poured on you and lit on fire. Even then, just because someone doesn't flee or deescalate doesn't mean they deserve to be lit on fire, holy shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

no part of this is "deserve".

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

I think you're grossly underestimating how much and how many women have to put up with this shit. You're thinking of this as a single incident where a man told a women to get in the kitchen, when it's actually years of that abuse.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)